![]() Tech support did everything they could think of to help me resolve this issue. So for some strange reason it looks like the precision X was conflicting with S1 V3 GUI. Soon as I closed it the tracking line would run smooth. When it was open I encountered the lagging on the recordhead and also by opening effects or instrument box you would only see the frame of the specific instrument or effects. I would close it and open it and test by opening the guitar tuner or guitar rig 5. Really analysing the obvious here.So there's a program that runs in the system tray called EVGA Precision X 16 which is associated with my GTX Titan video card. And even then it's not certain that people wouldn't continue buying based on brand. And that's a consumer choice, not AMD's fault.ĪMD needs at the same time stronger hardware than Nvidia, more favorable press coverage than Nvidia, higher TSMC capacity from Nvidia to lower prices and try to get some market share. The mentallity of "Please AMD lower prices so I can buy cheaper Intel and Nvidia hardware", is a thing of the past. AMD is at 50% profit margins, Nvidia will pass 70% if it hasn't done it already. Nvidia will keep selling with lower margins, but still higher margins than AMD. AMD in the end will manage nothing more than hurting itself. If AMD was lowering prices, Nvidia would follow. We see RTX 3050 selling much better than RX 6600 while RX 6600 is killing RTX 3050 in benchmarks. Nvidia enjoys the marketing advantage and a much stronger brand. Nvidia can flood the market with cheap GPUs, AMD can't, except if it decided to take capacity from Instinct, EPYC and Ryzen. Nvidia enjoys higher capacities than AMD from TSMC. It's led to a self-sustained marketing cycle where the popular OC'ers market the cards at those who want to chase performance. There just isn't a serious group out there who can push AMD cards as far as EVGA, Galax, and Kudan have done for NVIDIA. Thing though, is that AMD lacks the same level of hardcore support NVIDIA gets from OC'ers like KINGPIN who'd push their GPUs to the limit and even work some magic to make them better (and even provide some feedback to the company, as KINGPIN and his predecessors used to do with NVIDIA). Give them the support NVIDIA no longer wants to give. Considering that AMD claims to be more open to working with others than NVIDIA, that would be one thing I'd love for them to do start working with serious OC'ers on how to improve and push their GPUs. AMD could do with a KINGPIN and crew of their own ones who kitbash solutions on how to make their own GPUs clock higher, or effectively make custom cards out of top bins. That's something AMD should be working towards having serious OC'ers come and break their GPUs and feed the results back, leading to customs that can push beyond what the mainstream cards can do. Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek MidguardĬhieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Seasonic 400WĬoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / LogitechĬlick to expand.Thing though, is that AMD lacks the same level of hardcore support NVIDIA gets from OC'ers like KINGPIN who'd push their GPUs to the limit and even work some magic to make them better (and even provide some feedback to the company, as KINGPIN and his predecessors used to do with NVIDIA). Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) - 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5 ![]() NVMes, NVMes everywhere / Samsung 256GB NVMe + more / Kingston SSD 240GB XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / ATI Radeon HD 5670 MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3ġ6GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3) Ry/ Ryzen 5 4600G / AM3 Athlon 645 unlocked to 6 core 3.6+GHz 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |